经济理论与经济管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 70-83.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

收入分成、竞争与中国的省份内经济差距

  

  1. 中国人民大学财政金融学院
  • 出版日期:2022-04-16 发布日期:2022-05-09
  • 基金资助:
    本文是国家自然科学基金项目(72173123;71773128;71533006)和北京市社会科学基金青年学术带头人项目(21DTR009)的阶段性成果。

REVENUE SHARING, COMPETITION AND ECONOMIC DISPARITY WITHIN PROVINCES IN CHINA

  1. School of Finance, Renmin University of China
  • Online:2022-04-16 Published:2022-05-09

摘要: 中国的地区差距问题已逐渐成为制约经济发展的重要因素,并受到学术界的广泛关注。然而,作为其主要构成部分的省份内经济差距,现有研究却尚未深入。本文立足于省级以下财政分权体制,从地方政府竞争的角度梳理了政府间收入分成作用于省份内经济差距的具体机制,进而运用1995—2014年县级面板数据构建了省份内经济差距和省级以下收入分成指标,并展开实证检验。研究发现:省级以下收入分成比例的提高,扩大了省份内各县有效税率的差异,进而带来了要素在空间上的不均衡分布和省份内经济差距的扩大。同时,这一作用在经济欠发达省份的效果更为明显。这些发现为理解中国财政分权体制下地区经济差距的形成,以及完善当前财政体制以推动国家治理现代化提供了良好启示。

关键词: 收入分成, 财政分权, 省份内经济差距, 地方政府竞争

Abstract:  Regional disparity in China has gradually become one of the important constraints for further economic development and hence received widespread academic attention. However, economic disparity within provinces, acting as the main component of the overall regional disparity in the country, has not been examined rigorously. This paper aims to explore how intergovernmental revenue sharing at the provincesubprovincial level may affect economic disparity within provinces through the channel of local fiscal competition. Based on county level panel data from 1995 to 2014, this paper first builds both the indexes of economic disparity within governments and subprovincial revenue sharing ratios and then conduces empirical estimations. Our results indicate that: subprovincial revenue ratios significantly increase the disparity of county effective tax rates within provinces, which, in turn, induce unbalanced distribution of tax bases and hence exacerbating economic disparity within governments. This effect is also found to be more salient in less developed provinces. Overall, our study contributes to a better understanding of regional disparity in China and the modernization of Chinas system and capacity for governance from the perspective of fiscal decentralization arrangement.

Key words:  , revenue sharing, fiscal decentralization, economic disparity within provinces, local government competition