经济理论与经济管理 ›› 2012, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (10): 32-40.

• 理论探索 • 上一篇    下一篇

所有权和市场绩效的理论逻辑与经验证据——比较视角及去意识形态化反思

 石明明1, 张小军2   

  1. 中国人民大学商学院,北京100872; 2国家电网能源研究院,北京100052
  • 收稿日期:2011-12-22 出版日期:2012-10-20 发布日期:2012-10-25
  • 作者简介:石明明(1983—),女,江苏南通人,中国人民大学商学院讲师,经济学博士; 张小军(1981—),男,陕西榆林人,国家电网能源研究院工程师,经济师,经济学博士。
  • 基金资助:

    国家社会科学基金重大项目(06&ZD006)

THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL EVIDENCES FOR
OWNERSHIP AND MARKET PERFORMANCE——Comparative Perspective and Deideological Rethink

 SHI  Ming-Ming-1, ZHANG  Xiao-Jun-2   

  1. 1.School of Business, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China;
    2.State Grid Energy Research Institute, Beijing 100052, China
  • Received:2011-12-22 Online:2012-10-20 Published:2012-10-25

摘要: 本文通过对新古典经济学、契约理论等理论的最新反思,并根据新比较经济学、新规制理论、混合寡占模型等理论分析与经验研究的最新进展,为所有权与市场绩效关系提供了更深刻细致的见解。以往关于所有权与市场绩效的研究深受特定政治偏好与制度约束的影响,很多研究存在系统性缺陷,结果常常缺乏稳健性。当代研究更加注重“去意识形态化”的科学态度和模型设置背后的知识假定,现有的理论与计量分析工具只能证明国家所有权与私人所有权互有优劣,相关研究必须避免外生假定一种所有制结构的优越性,这样才能重新开辟出一片更为广阔的领域。

关键词: 混合所有制经济 , 所有权 , 市场绩效 , 内部规制策略

Abstract: This paper reviewed the recent theoretical and empirical studies on relationship between ownership and market performance which had exceeded the simple conclusion in 1980s and 1990s discussion. The researches, including reconsiderations on the neoclassical economics and contract theory, new comparative economics, new regulation theory, mixed oligopoly models, provided profound insights into the relationship. The latest empirical researches indicated that the original literatures were deeply influenced by the specific political preference and institution restriction, many of which lacked of systematic and robustness. Latest researches paid more attention to the scientific attitude of deideology and hypothesis of model settings. This paper illustrated that theoretical and econometric analytical tools proved that each ownership structure had both advantages and disadvantages. To avoid the premise that one was superior to the other might be a right direction to update the studies.  

Key words: mixed ownership , ownership , market performance , internal regulation strategy