比较创新体制与比较历史创新体制——开创比较经济学研究的新框架

经济理论与经济管理 ›› 2011, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 17-26.

比较创新体制与比较历史创新体制——开创比较经济学研究的新框架

贾根良

中国人民大学经济学院, 北京 100872

收稿日期:2010-12-28 出版日期:2011-05-16 发布日期:2011-06-29
作者简介:贾根良(1962- ),男,河北蠡县人,中国人民大学经济学院教授,博士生导师,经济学博士.
基金资助:
中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)项目:“新经济思想史研究”(10XNJ015)

COMPARATIVE INNOVATION SYSTEMS AND COMPARATIVE HISTORICAL INNOVATION SYSTEMS:A NEW FRAMEWORK OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS

JIA Gen-liang

School of Economics, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China

Received:2010-12-28 Online:2011-05-16 Published:2011-06-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 近十几年来,建基于新制度经济学和博弈论的广泛影响,比较制度分析和历史制度分析在比较经济学领域已经成为最有影响的分析范式,但它在处理技术创新、制度演化和结构变迁等诸多问题上却存在着固有的缺陷。为了克服这些缺陷,本文以演化经济学的研究纲领为基础,提出了比较创新体制和比较历史创新体制作为比较经济学研究新框架的构想,简要说明了它在基础理论上与比较制度分析和历史制度分析所存在的重大差别,论述了这种新框架的概念、体系内容和意义所在,综述了相关研究的最新进展,并讨论了比较创新体制和比较历史创新体制的重大前沿问题。本文认为,比较创新体制和比较历史创新体制是我国创新型国家建设不可或缺的研究工具,它为比较经济学的新发展提供了最有价值的新范式和新框架,比较经济学界不应该把其发展排除在视野之外。

关键词: 比较创新体制, 比较历史创新体制, 比较制度分析, 历史制度分析, 演化经济学, 创新型国家建设

Abstract: In recent decades,in virtue of abroad influence from new institutional economics and game theory,comparative institutional analysis and historical institutional analysis have become the most influential analytical paradigms in the field of comparative economics.However,these two paradigms are both deficient in dealing with many issues such as technological innovation,institutional evolution and structure transition.To overcome these shortcomings,based on the methodology of evolutionary economics,this paper put forward a new idea to constitute comparative innovation systems and comparative historical innovation systems as a new framework of comparative economics,and briefly accounted for the great theoretical differences between the new framework and the old one.Furthermore,this paper discussed the concept,system and significance of this new framework,reviewed the latest progress of relative research,and discussed the major hot issues about comparative innovation systems and comparative historical innovation systems.This paper concluded that comparative innovation systems and comparative historical innovation systems were indispensable research tools for the construction of innovation-oriented nation,and provided the most valuable paradigm and framework for the development of comparative economics,which should not be excluded by comparative economics.

Key words: comparative innovation system, comparative historical innovation system, comparative institutional analysis, historical institutional analysis, evolutionary economics, construction of innovation-oriented nation

中图分类号:

F318

贾根良. 比较创新体制与比较历史创新体制——开创比较经济学研究的新框架[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2011, 31(5): 17-26.

JIA Gen-liang. COMPARATIVE INNOVATION SYSTEMS AND COMPARATIVE HISTORICAL INNOVATION SYSTEMS:A NEW FRAMEWORK OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS[J]. Economic Theory and Business Management, 2011, 31(5): 17-26.

参考文献

[1] 张仁德,等.新比较经济学研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2002.
[2] Richard R.Nelson.National Innovation Systems.A Comparative Analysis[M].New York:Oxford University Press,1993.
[3] 何自力.比较制度经济学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2007.
[4] 张仁德.新比较经济学研究与构建[J].经济学动态,2006,(11).
[5] 赖纳特,贾根良.穷国的国富论:演化发展经济学论文选(下卷)[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2007.
[6] 贾根良.复杂性科学革命与演化经济学的发展[J].学术月刊,2006,(2).
[7] 赖纳特,贾根良.穷国的国富论:演化发展经济学论文选(上卷)[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2007.
[8] 熊彼特.资本主义、社会主义和民主主义[M].北京:商务印书馆,1979.
[9] 埃里克·S·赖纳特.国家在经济增长中的作用[A].霍奇逊.制度与演化经济学现代文选:关键性概念[C].北京:高等教育出版社,2005.
[10] 贾根良,等."经济学改革国际运动"研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2009.
[11] 贾根良.理解演化经济学[J].中国社会科学,2004,(2).
[12] Hiroyuki Odagiri,Akira Goto,Atsushi Sunami,Richard R.Nelson.Intellectual Property Rights,Development,and Catch-up:An International Comparative Study[M].Oxford University Press,2010.
[13] 莫里厄,纳尔逊.领先之源:七个行业的分析[M].北京:人民邮电出版社,2003.
[14] Franco Malerba.Sectoral Systems of Innovation Concepts,Issues and Analyses of Six Major Sectors in Europe[J].Cambridge University Press,2004.
[15] Michael Hobday.Asian Innovation Experiences and Latin American Visions:Exploiting Shifts in Techno-Economic Paradigms[A].Wolfgang Drechsler,Erik Reinert,Rainer Kattel.Techno-economic Paradigms:Essays in Honor of Carlota Perez[C].Anthem,London,2009.
[16] Rainer Kattel,Annalisa Primi.The Periphery Paradox in Innovation Policy:Latin America and Eastern Europe Compared-some Reflections on Why It Is not Enough to Say that Innovation Matters for Development[EB/OL].http://www.ttu.ee/hum,2010-11-20.
[17] Rodrigo Arocena,Judith Sutz.Innovation Systems and Developing Countries[EB/OL].http://www3.druid.dk/wp/20020005,pdf,2010-12-01.
[18] 弗里曼,卢桑.光阴似箭--从工业革命到信息革命[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007.
[19] 罗斯托.这一切是怎么开始的--现代经济的起源[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997.
[20] Johann Peter Murmann.Knowledge and Competitive Advantage..The Coevolution of Firms,Technology and National Institutions[M].Cambridge University Press,2003.
[21] 贾根良.政治经济学的美国学派与大国崛起的经济学逻辑[J].政治经济学评论,2010,(3).
[22] 赫德森.保护主义:美国经济崛起的秘诀(1815-1914)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010.
[23] Paul R.Gregory,Robert C.Stuart.Comparing Economic Systems in the Twenty-first Century[M].Houghton Mifflin Company,2004.
[24] Alexander Ebner.Understanding Varieties in the Structure and Performance of National Innovation Systems:The Concept of Economic Style[A].John Groenewegen,Jack J.Vromen.Institution and Evolution of Capitalism[C].Edward Elgar Publishing,Inc.,1999.
[25] 贾根良.演化经济学的本体论假设及其实践指导价值[J].当代财经,2010,(7).
[26] Kurt Dopfer,John Foster,Jason Potts.Micro-meso-macro[J].Journal of Evolutionary Economics,2004,(14).
[27] 贾根良,等.西方异端经济学主要流派研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010.
[28] 贾根良,王晓蓉.国家创新能力测评的缺陷与体制研究的重要性[J].中国人民大学学报,2008,(5).
[29] Richard R.Nelson.Economic Development from the Perspective of Evolutionary Economic Theory[EB/OL].http://www.ttu.ee/hum,2010-11-20.