低碳经济背景下化石能源补贴改革障碍及中国对策研究

经济理论与经济管理 ›› 2010, Vol. ›› Issue (10): 20-26.

低碳经济背景下化石能源补贴改革障碍及中国对策研究

李虹

北京大学经济学院, 北京, 100871

收稿日期:2010-04-12 出版日期:2010-10-16 发布日期:2012-03-01
基金资助:
美国能源基金会课题“中国电力产业提高能源效率和减少污染的管制行动”(2007年);教育部人文社会科学项目“中国电力价格体制改革研究——煤电价格联动的政策效应”(09YJA790006);中国博士后科学基金“可持续发展与社会公平:基于能源补贴理论与政策实践的研究”(20090460202)

RESEARCH ON THE BARRIERS OF FOSSIL ENERGY SUBSIDY REFORM AND CHINA'S CORRESPONDING STRATEGY AGAINST THE BACKGROUND OF LOW-CARBON ECONOMY

LI Hong

School of Economics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Received:2010-04-12 Online:2010-10-16 Published:2012-03-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 作为构建低碳经济、实现经济和环境可持续发展的必要手段之一,化石能源补贴改革已经被越来越多的国家列入政府的议事日程。但已有的改革经验表明,改革进程中的重重阻力会导致改革无法实施或者彻底进行。为此,本文结合中国自身特有的政治经济环境,基于经济合作与发展组织的压力—状态—响应(pressure-state-response,PSR)模型构建主体、目标、执行(agent-objective-execute,AOE)三层次分析模型,深入阐述中国化石能源补贴改革过程中将要遇到的系列障碍,并为政府顺利实施改革提供具有可操作性的政策建议。

关键词: 低碳经济, 化石能源补贴, 改革障碍

Abstract: As a critical means of constructing low-carbon economy and realizing sustainable development of economy and environment,fossil energy subsidy reform has been put on the agenda by more and more countries,whereas it is told from already carried-out reforms that this reform will encounter various barriers and unforeseeable difficulties,resulting in failure or incomplete implementation.Therefore,based on China's special political and economic environment,with the tool of Pressure-State-Response(PSR) of economic cooperation and development organizations,this paper constructs a three-phase Agent-Objective-Execute(AOE) analytical model,and elaborates on the possible barriers that may hinder China's fossil energy subsidy reform.Finally,this paper puts forward some feasible suggestions for the government to carry out this reform.

Key words: low-carbon economy, fossil energy subsidy, barriers of reform

中图分类号:

F250

李虹. 低碳经济背景下化石能源补贴改革障碍及中国对策研究[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2010, (10): 20-26.

LI Hong. RESEARCH ON THE BARRIERS OF FOSSIL ENERGY SUBSIDY REFORM AND CHINA'S CORRESPONDING STRATEGY AGAINST THE BACKGROUND OF LOW-CARBON ECONOMY[J]. Economic Theory and Business Management, 2010, (10): 20-26.