相关市场的认定与发展及对中国反垄断执法的借鉴

经济理论与经济管理 ›› 2009, Vol. ›› Issue (5): 31-36.

THE IDENTIFICATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF RELEVANT MARKET——IMPLICATIONS FOR CHINA'S ANTI-TRUST LAW ADMINISTRATION IN THE FUTURE

LI Hong¹, ZHANG Xin-zhu²

1. Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;
2. Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100732, China

Received:2009-01-06 Online:2009-05-16 Published:2012-03-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 相关市场是与经济学中的市场不同的一个概念,它仅仅是为了反垄断目的而界定出来的市场。相关市场界定理论的产生晚于其司法实践,它是伴随着经济学理论的发展而产生发展起来的。产业组织理论中的哈佛学派揭示了反垄断中相关市场的含义,构建了一套用以分析反垄断所有领域的经济学和法律问题的系统分析框架;其后的芝加哥学派完善了相关市场界定的理论方法,提出了具有里程碑意义的、目前国际通行的SSNIP检验法。

关键词: 反垄断, 相关市场, 相关市场界定

Abstract: Relevant market is conceptually different from the term "market" used in economics,as the former is defined merely for the purpose of anti-trust use.The theory on relevant market emerged later than judicial practice did,and then has further advanced as economic theory moves forward.The Harvard school of industrial organization theory has revealed the meaning of relevant market in the context of anti-trust,and constructed a systematic analytical framework on economic and legal issues in the area of anti-trust.The Chicago school later has consummated the theory on defining relevant market,and put forward the SSNP method which is milestone implication and wildly adopted in international practice.

Key words: anti-trust, relevant market, definition of relevant market

中图分类号:

F038.2

李虹, 张昕竹. 相关市场的认定与发展及对中国反垄断执法的借鉴[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2009, (5): 31-36.

LI Hong, ZHANG Xin-zhu. THE IDENTIFICATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF RELEVANT MARKET——IMPLICATIONS FOR CHINA'S ANTI-TRUST LAW ADMINISTRATION IN THE FUTURE[J]. Economic Theory and Business Management, 2009, (5): 31-36.

参考文献

[1] George J.Stigler.The Theory of Competitive Price[M].New York:Macmillan Company,1942.92.
[2] Antoine A.Cournot.Recherches sur les Principes Mathematiques de la Theorie des Richesses(Researches into the Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth)[M].New York:Macmillan Company,1927.51-52.
[3] Alfred Marshall.Principles of Economics[M].London:Macmillan and Co.,Ltd,1920.325.
[4] Gregory J.Werden.Market Delineation and the Justice Department's Merger Guidelines[J].Duke Law Journal,1983,(3).
[5] Landes M William,Posner A.Richard.An Economic Theory of Intentional Torts[J].International Review of Law and Economics,1981,1(2).
[6] Edward Chamberlin.The Theory of Monopolistic Competition:A Reorientation of the Theory of Value[M].Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,1962.
[7] Fritz Machlup.The Economics of Seller's Competition[M].Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press,1952.
[8] Edward S.Mason.Price and Production Policies of Large-Scale Enterprises EJ].American Economic Review,1939,29(1).
[9] Carl Kaysen,Donald F.Turner.Antitrust Policy:An Economic and Legal Analysis[Z].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1959.
[10] Derek Bok.Section 7 of the Clayton Act and the Merging of Law and Economics[J].Harvard Law Review,1960,74(2).
[11] Carl Kaysen,Donald F.Turner.Antitrust Policy:An Economic and Legal Analysis[M].Cambridge,Harvard University Press,1959.
[12] United States v.Columbia Steel Co..Supreme Court of the United States 334 U.S.862;68 S.Ct.1 525; 92 L.Ed.1 781:1 948 U.S.Lexis 1 974[EB/OL].http://www.lexisnexis.com,2008-11-05.
[13] United States v.Aluminum Co.of America(Alcoa).Supreme Court of the United States 389 U.S.49;88 S.Ct.233;19 L.Ed.2d 47;1 967 U.S.Lexis 2 933;1967 Trade Cas.(CCH)[EB/OL].http://www.lexisnexis.com,2008-11-08.
[14] United States v.Philadelphia National Bank.Supreme Court of the United States 457 U.S.1 105;102 S.Ct.2 904;73 L.Ed.2d 1 314;1 982 U.S.Lexis 2 432;50 U.S.L.W.3 963[EB/OL].http://www.lexisnexis.com,2008-11-09.
[15] United States v.Corn Products Refining Co..Supreme Court of the United States 332 U.S.786; 1 947 U.S.Lexis 2 002[EB/OL].http://www.lexisnexis.com,2008-11-11.
[16] J.N.D.Notes.Product Market Definition under the Sherman and Clayton Acts[J].University of Pennsylvania Law Review,1962,110(6).
[17] 王为农.企业集中规制基本法理:美国、日本及欧盟的反垄断法比较研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2001.
[18] James May.Redirecting the Future:Law and the Future and the Seeds of Change in Modern Antitrust Law[J].Mississippi College Law Review,1996,17(43).
[19] Continental T.V.,Inc.,v.Gte Sylvania INC.Supreme Court of the United States 433 U.S.36;97 S.Ct.2 549;53 L.Ed.2d 568;1 977 U.S.Lexis 134;1 977-1 Trade Cas.(CCH)P61,488[EB/OL].http://www.lexisnexis.com,2008-11-11.
[20] Brunswick Corp.v.Pueblo Bowl-o-mat,Inc..Supreme Court of the United States 429 U.S.477;97S.Ct.690;50L.Ed.2d 701;1 977 U.S.Lexis 37;1 977-1 Trade Cas.(CCH)P61,255[EB/OL].http://www.lexisnexis.com,2008-12-05.
[21] Bruadcast Music,Inc.,et al.v.Columbia Broadcasting System,Inc..Supreme Court of the United States 441 U.S.1;99 S.Ct.1551;60 L.Ed.2d 1;1 979 U.S.Lexis 84;201 U.s.P.Q.(BNA)497;Copy.L.Rep.(CCH)P25,064;1 979-1 Trade Cas.(CCH)P62,558[EB/OL].http://www.lexisnexis.com,2008-12-05.
[22] Morris A.Adelman.Economic Aspects of the Bethlehem Opinion[J].Virginia Law Review,1959,45(5).
[23] Phillip E.Areeda,Donald F.Turner.Antitrust Law:An Analysis of Antitrust Principles and Their Application[M].Boston:Little,Brown and Company,1978.