经济理论与经济管理 ›› 2009, Vol. ›› Issue (10): 41-47.

• 工商管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国审计体制改革观点的比较与选择

肖泽忠1, 杨肃昌2, 高培勇3   

  1. 1. 对外经济贸易大学, 北京, 100029;
    2. 兰州大学, 兰州, 730000;
    3. 中国社会科学院, 北京, 100732
  • 收稿日期:2009-07-16 出版日期:2009-10-16 发布日期:2012-03-01
  • 基金资助:
    中国人民大学“985”工程中国经济研究哲学社会科学创新基地;中国人民大学科学研究基金项目(22385006)

AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF THE PROPOSED APPROACHES TO GOVERNMENT AUDITING REFORM

XIAO Ze-zhong1, YANG Su-chang2, GAO Pei-yong3   

  1. 1. Foreign Economic and Trade University, Beijing 100029, China;
    2. Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;
    3. Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100732, China
  • Received:2009-07-16 Online:2009-10-16 Published:2012-03-01

摘要: 国家审计体制改革必须遵循三方面的原则:改革应适应中国政治经济发展要求,改革应能提高审计的独立性,改革应具有现实可能性。用这些原则来衡量,尽管各种改革观点均有缺点,但立法论符合大部分原则的要求,可作为改革的目标模式。鉴于这一方法在可行性上在若干方面受到质疑,建议采用双轨制作为过渡模式。

关键词: 国家审计, 审计监督, 审计体制改革

Abstract: In our opinion,government audit reform should follow three principles:(1)it must fulfill the requirements of political and economic development,(2)it should help enhance audit independence and(3)it must be practical and feasible.Every proposed reform approach has weaknesses against these criteria,but we consider that the legislature approach conforms to most of the principles and can be used as the target model of reform.As this approach is criticized for being unrealistic in several regards,we suggest that the dual track approach could be used as a transitive reform approach.

Key words: national audit, auditing supervision, audit system reform

中图分类号: