经济理论与经济管理 ›› 2009, Vol. ›› Issue (1): 44-50.

• 金融研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

危机转移视角下的金融危机解读

郭劲光   

  1. 东北财经大学公共管理学院, 辽宁大连 116025
  • 收稿日期:2008-10-04 出版日期:2009-01-16 发布日期:2012-03-01
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究项目(07JC790018);国家自然科学基金项目(70703003)

AN INTERPRETATION OF THE FINANCIAL CRISIS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF CRISIS TRANSFER

GUO Jin-guang   

  1. DongBei University of Finance and Economics, Dalian, liaoning 116025, China
  • Received:2008-10-04 Online:2009-01-16 Published:2012-03-01

摘要: 传统的危机态主要是以产能危机为核心特质的危机形态;而现代的危机态则是以信用危机为核心特质的危机形态。这两种危机态在发生机制、传导机制等方面存在着本质上的差异,这使得经典的危机"中心—边缘"结构假说在解释此次美国金融危机时陷入了理论困惑,但两种危机态的"中心—边缘"危机转移规律是不变的。我国应当在世界金融体系不断解构与升级的进程中准确地定位,加强监管,防范风险,从金融制度、金融工具乃至产业发展等方面采取积极有效的策略加以应对。

关键词: “中心—边缘”结构, 金融危机, 传统危机态, 现代危机态

Abstract: A traditional crisis usually demonstrates as a crisis in production capacity,but a modern crisis generally demonstrates as a credit crisis.There are fundamental differences in the generative mechanisms and transmission mechanisms of the two kinds of crises,which have made the classical "center-periphery" structural hypothesis invalid in explaining the current financial crisis in the US.However,the classical "center-periphery" crisis-transferring mechanism does not change in both kinds of crises.In the process of destructing and ever-escalating of the world financial system,China should locate itself appropriately such that it can strengthen regulation and prevent risks;specifically,China needs to cope with current situation with active and effective strategies in aspects such as financial institutions,financial tools,and industrial development.

Key words: the "center-periphery" structural hypothesis, financial crisis, traditional crisis, modern crisis

中图分类号: