经济理论与经济管理 ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (8): 18-31.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

分权时序与企业实际税负

  

  1. 詹新宇,北京工商大学国际经管学院;靳取,中南财经政法大学财政税务学院。
  • 出版日期:2023-08-16 发布日期:2023-09-14
  • 基金资助:
    本文得到研究阐释党的二十大精神国家社会科学基金重大项目“以高质量发展推进现代化建设的核心要求与制度保障研究”(项目编号:23ZDA027)的资助。

THE SEQUENCE OF DECENTRALIZATION AND THE ACTUAL TAX BURDEN OF ENTERPRISES

  1. 1School of International Economics and Management,Beijing Technology and Business University;
    2School of Finance and Taxation,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
  • Online:2023-08-16 Published:2023-09-14

摘要: 中国地方政府近年来陆续开展的行政“扩权强县”与财政“省直管县”改革存在着鲜明的时序差异,主要分为“先财后行”“先行后财”“并行分权”三种类型。这三种类型的分权时序对县级政府税收征管力度的冲击存在差异,进而对辖区内企业实际税负产生非对称影响。为此,本文将中国工业企业数据与县级面板数据进行匹配,建立多时点双重差分模型,研究分权时序对企业实际税负的影响及其机制。结果显示,“先财后行”分权时序显著降低了企业实际税负,“先行后财”分权时序加重了企业实际税负,而“并行分权”分权时序对企业实际税负的影响并不显著。机制分析发现,“先财后行”分权时序实施后县级政府财政压力相对减轻,税收征管力度有所下降;“先行后财”分权时序实施后县级政府财政压力相对增大,税收征管力度相应增强;“并行分权”分权时序实施后县级财政压力相对不变,税收征管力度变化不显著。据此,本文提出了优化分权时序、完善地方税体系、健全税收征管监督机制等政策建议。

关键词: 分权时序, 地方财政压力, 企业实际税负

Abstract: There are sequential differences in Chinese style decentralization reforms such as “strengthening county power” and “provincially administered counties” The first one is to implement decentralization in the field of finance first,and then in the economic and social field;the second one is to implement decentralization in the economic and social field first,and then in the field of finance;and the third one is to implement decentralization simultaneously in the finance field and in the economic and social field These three types of decentralization reform have different effects on taxation efforts,and thus have asymmetric effects on the actual tax burden of enterprises This paper matches the data of Chinese industrial enterprises with countylevel data and establishes a staggered DID model to study the influence and mechanism of the sequence of decentralization on the actual tax burden of enterprises The study confirms that implementing decentralization in the finance field first and then in the economic and social field can reduce the actual tax burden of enterprises For areas with administrative decentralization in advance,the actual tax burden of enterprises has been increased after decentralization reform For enterprises in regions where the two fields are decentralized simultaneously,the actual tax burden does not change significantly Mechanism analysis finds that the fiscal pressure of countylevel governments will be reduced and taxation efforts will decrease after the decentralization sequence of “finance field first,economic and social field later”;the fiscal pressure of countylevel governments has increased after the decentralization sequence of “economic and social field first,finance field later”,and taxation efforts have been strengthened;after the “parallel decentralization” sequence of decentralization,countylevel fiscal pressures remain relatively unchanged,and tax efforts remain unchanged Based on the research conclusions,this paper suggests that local governments should consider the decentralization sequence,improve the local tax system,and improve the local government tax collection and supervision mechanism

Key words: decentralization sequential, local fiscal pressure, actual tax burden of enterprises