经济理论与经济管理

• 公共经济 • 上一篇    下一篇

地方政府干预与劳动收入份额:基于分税制的视角*

赵秋运1,李成明2,胡巧玉3   

  1. 赵秋运,北京大学国家发展研究院,新结构经济学研究中心,邮政编码:100871,电子信箱: fuyunshuangquan@163com;李成明,北京大学经济学院;胡巧玉,人保投资控股有限公司。
  • 出版日期:2017-12-16 发布日期:2017-12-20

LOCAL GOVERNMENT INTERVENE AND LABOR INCOME SHARE: BASED ON THE TAX DECENTRALIZATION IN CHINA#br#

ZHAO Qiu-yun1,LI Cheng-ming2,HU Qiao-yu3   

  1. 1Center for New Structural Economics,Peking University; National School of Development,Peking University; 2School of Economics,Peking University; 3PICC Investment Holding Co,Ltd
  • Online:2017-12-16 Published:2017-12-20
  • Supported by:
    本文得到国家自然科学基金项目(71473089)、国家自然科学基金青年项目(71303054)、国家社会科学基金面上项目(16BJY097)以及国家社会科学基金青年项目 (15CJL025)的资助。

摘要: 既有文献对中国劳动收入份额下降成因的解释集中在资本深化、产业结构转变、技术进步、全球化、二元经济、制度转型以及财政和融资约束等宏观和微观路径等方面,本文在分税制背景下从地方政府干预这一新的视角出发,解读中国劳动收入份额下降这一现象。本文首先探讨地方政府干预恶化制度环境,并进一步导致劳动收入份额下降的作用机制。然后,笔者运用1984—2015年的省际面板数据,建立实证模型并分析。本文研究发现,政府干预下的制度环境是导致劳动收入份额下降的主要原因。如果要提高劳动收入份额,就应该减少地方政府的干预,塑造良好的制度软环境。本文在控制内生性问题和其他潜在的各种影响因素后,上述结论仍具有稳健性。

关键词: 分税制 , 地方政府干预 , 劳动收入份额

Abstract: From a new perspectivelocal government intervention in the context of tax distribution system,this paper tries to make a reasonable explanation for the continued decline in the labor income share in ChinaOur explanation is different from the ideas in existing literature,which focus on macroand micropath of the role of capital deepening,industrial structural change,technological progress,globalization,dual economy,institutional restructuring and financial and financial,etcThis paper discusses the local government intervention worsening institutional environment,and further lead to the decline of labor income share mechanismThen,we apply the 1984—2015 provincial panel data to establish an empirical model and analyze itThe results show as followsThe deterioration of the institutional environment and local government intervention has significantly inhibited on labor income shareIn order to improve labor income share,it requires to reduce local government intervention and to create a health institutional environmentAfter controlling the endogenous problems and other potential anomalies various factors,the above conclusions are still robust

Key words: tax decentralization , local government intervene , labor income share