经济理论与经济管理

• 企业与组织研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

论反垄断规则的优化设计*

陈享光,钟洲   

  1. 中国人民大学经济学院
  • 出版日期:2016-07-16 发布日期:2016-07-21

THE OPTIMAL DESIGN OF ANTIMONOPOLY RULES

CHEN Xiang-guang,ZHONG Zhou   

  1. School of Economics,Renmin University of China
  • Online:2016-07-16 Published:2016-07-21

摘要:

近年来,来自经济理论的批评促使欧美法院与执法机构对搭售、转售价格维持等行为的判定从本身违法规则逐渐转向更依赖于实质效果的替代规则。但不同法院、执法机构与学界就本身违法规则的优化方案各执一词,鲜有文献探讨一个合理的优化设计应该考虑哪些因素,遵循哪些条件,对中国反垄断规则优化设计的一般性探讨更是凤毛麟角。本文试图在借鉴和拓展错判成本路径理论的基础上对此进行研究,提出以“动机安全港”为核心的反垄断规则优化方案,以兼顾判罚的准确性、优化的可操作性、规制成本、自由裁量权限制与法律的威慑作用。依据该优化方案,本文对最高法院在3Q案中提出的搭售规则进行了案例分析。

关键词: 本身违法 , 优化设计 , 搭售 , 错判成本 , 安全港

Abstract:

The criticism from modern IO researches has pushed the courts and antimonopoly agencies in US and EU to apply more “effectbased” rules instead of per se prohibitions in cases related to tying, RPM etc Various types of optimal solution have been suggested both in practice and literature, but few of which have taken a step further to inquiry the criteria or processes that a reasonable optimal design should meet, let alone studies focused on Antimonopoly Law of China In this paper, we provide a preliminary analysis of the optimal design based on “error cost approach” theory The accuracy, operability, discretionary power and regulation cost related to the optimization have all been taken into account and an optimized scheme highlights the introduction of “intent safe harbor” has been proposed For better illustration, a case study of tying rule in Qihu 360 vs Tencent is introduced at the end of the paper.

Key words:  per se prohibition , optimal design , tying , error cost , safe harbor