Economic Theory and Business Management ›› 2011, Vol. ›› Issue (1): 50-58.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

THEORETICAL MODEL OF INSTITUTIONAL BEING POOR: POLICY DISCRIMINATION AND THE ASYMMETRY OF INSTITUTIONAL RETURN AND COST

DONG Xiao-dan, WEN Tie-jun   

  1. Institute of Advanced Studies for Sustainability, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
  • Received:2010-11-12 Online:2012-02-21 Published:2011-01-16

致贫的制度经济学研究:制度成本与制度收益的不对称性分析

董筱丹, 温铁军   

  1. 中国人民大学可持续发展高等研究院, 北京, 100872
  • 作者简介:董筱丹(1978- ),女,黑龙江拜泉人,中国人民大学可持续发展高等研究院讲师,管理学博士;温铁军(1951),男,北京市人,中国人民大学可持续发展高等研究院执行院长,教 授,博士生导师,管理学博士.
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大项目“完善社会管理与维护社会稳定机制研究——农村对抗性冲突的原因及其化解机制研究”(07ZD&048);教育部应急课题“通过新农村建设促进国家金融危机条件下中国经济社会的和谐与可持续发展”(2009JYJR023);北京地区普通高等学校首都经济学科群建设项目(2010—2012);中国人民大学985三期项目

Abstract: By developing a model of institutional discriminatory policy for diversified benefited groups,we argue that institutional return and cost is asymmetric and the asymmetry comes from the institutional structure.Furthermore,as the institutional cost is to be transferred layer by layer,an unlimited pursuit of maximizing returns by the institutional dominant will not only lead to ever widening gaps between the rich and the poor and to social unrest,but also to negative feedback of ecology and environment,which will severely challenge the security and sustainability of human beings.

Key words: institutional being poor, institutional cost transfer, negative feedback, human security

摘要: 本文通过构建多元利益结构下的政策歧视模型,指出制度成本与制度收益的不对称关系具有内生性,这是致贫制度的核心特征。本文进一步指出,由于制度成本的层层转嫁,主导者无约束地追求收益最大化,不仅将导致当代社会贫富分化加剧和社会动荡,还将招致自然生态和资源、环境的严重负反馈,给人类自身的可持续性带来严峻挑战。

关键词: 制度致贫, 制度成本转嫁, 负反馈, 人类安全

CLC Number: