经济理论与经济管理

• 金融研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国企业集团关联交易:掏空支持 还是相互保险*

许荣1,徐星美2,权小锋3   

  1. 1  中国人民大学财政金融学院及中国财政金融政策研究中心;  2  中国人民大学国际学院;  3  苏州大学东吴商学院
  • 出版日期:2015-12-16 发布日期:2015-12-24
  • 基金资助:

    本文得到国家自然科学基金面上项目(71472180)、中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)项目(2015030062)及北京市社会科学基金项目(13JGC084)的资助。

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS IN CHINESE BUSINESS GROUPS:  TUNNELING,PROPPING OR COINSURANCE

XU Rong-1,XU Xing-mei-2,QUAN Xiao-feng-3   

  1. 1.School of Finance, Renmin University of China; 2.International College, Renmin University of China;3.Dongwu Business School, Soochow University
  • Online:2015-12-16 Published:2015-12-24

摘要:

已有文献对于企业集团核心经济功能存在巨大争论,综合考虑掏空和支持互动机制有可能克服单一的掏空或支持视角研究的局限。本文实证考察了我国企业集团内部掏空和支持的时机选择、工具差异和经济后果,结果表明:当上市公司面临退市风险时,控股股东同时提供融资类和非融资类关联交易支持,而当控股股东陷入财务困境时,上市公司仅提供融资类关联交易支持,非对称存在的掏空支持互动机制构成集团内部成员间的相互保险。本文再利用证监会关联交易监管政策变动外生冲击开展的自然实验研究提供了补充证据,其政策含义在于监管当局应考虑制定关联交易的相机监管政策。\

关键词: 企业集团 , 关联交易 , 掏空 , 支持 , 相互保险

Abstract:

Existing literatures have arguments on business groups function for its facilitating the controlling shareholder tunneling or propping the listed companies. Considering the dynamic interactions of tunneling and propping may overcome the limitation of single perspective. This paper investigates the timing selection, tool difference and economic consequences of tunneling and propping interactions. The results show that when listed companies facing delisted risk, controlling shareholder provides supports by both financing and nonfinancing RPTs. In turn, when controlling shareholder falls into financial crisis, only financing RPTs is provided by listed companies. The asymmetry interactions consist of coinsurance relationship among members of business groups, and the natural experiment based on RPTs regulatory policy change provides additional evidence. This finding has policy implications that regulators should make RPTs policies more flexible especially under crisis circumstance.

Key words: business group , related party transactions , tunneling , propping , coinsurance