Economic Theory and Business Management ›› 2009, Vol. ›› Issue (1): 44-50.
Previous Articles Next Articles
GUO Jin-guang
Received:
Online:
Published:
郭劲光
基金资助:
Abstract: A traditional crisis usually demonstrates as a crisis in production capacity,but a modern crisis generally demonstrates as a credit crisis.There are fundamental differences in the generative mechanisms and transmission mechanisms of the two kinds of crises,which have made the classical "center-periphery" structural hypothesis invalid in explaining the current financial crisis in the US.However,the classical "center-periphery" crisis-transferring mechanism does not change in both kinds of crises.In the process of destructing and ever-escalating of the world financial system,China should locate itself appropriately such that it can strengthen regulation and prevent risks;specifically,China needs to cope with current situation with active and effective strategies in aspects such as financial institutions,financial tools,and industrial development.
Key words: the "center-periphery" structural hypothesis, financial crisis, traditional crisis, modern crisis
摘要: 传统的危机态主要是以产能危机为核心特质的危机形态;而现代的危机态则是以信用危机为核心特质的危机形态。这两种危机态在发生机制、传导机制等方面存在着本质上的差异,这使得经典的危机"中心—边缘"结构假说在解释此次美国金融危机时陷入了理论困惑,但两种危机态的"中心—边缘"危机转移规律是不变的。我国应当在世界金融体系不断解构与升级的进程中准确地定位,加强监管,防范风险,从金融制度、金融工具乃至产业发展等方面采取积极有效的策略加以应对。
关键词: “中心—边缘”结构, 金融危机, 传统危机态, 现代危机态
CLC Number:
F831.59
GUO Jin-guang. AN INTERPRETATION OF THE FINANCIAL CRISIS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF CRISIS TRANSFER[J]. Economic Theory and Business Management, 2009, (1): 44-50.
郭劲光. 危机转移视角下的金融危机解读[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2009, (1): 44-50.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://jjll.ruc.edu.cn/EN/
http://jjll.ruc.edu.cn/EN/Y2009/V/I1/44